FALASTEEN · The complete table of contents

Contents

الفهرس

A room of the archive

The Majlis

المجلس

Belonging

There is no partial Palestinian

الانتماء

If you have one Palestinian parent, or one Palestinian grandparent, or a great-grandmother from a village whose name you can only half pronounce — this page is written to you, and the answer is not complicated. You are Palestinian. You can be something else as well. That does not make you any less of it.

What follows is the archive saying that in its own voice, and then the documented record of why it needed saying: who controls the register that decides whether a Palestinian exists on paper, who may hold a document, and what happened to the right of return. Those are two different kinds of sentence and this page keeps them apart on purpose. The distance between them is the whole subject.

Who is Palestinian

الهُويّة

The archive’s position, in its own voice

There is no partial Palestinian. A drop of Palestinian blood in your veins makes you 100% Palestinian. It is not a zero-sum game: you are Palestinian. You can be something else as well, but you are not any less Palestinian.

Read that as what it is — a refusal, not a formula. It is not a blood-quantum claim; it is the rejection of one. Blood quantum is how settler states have counted indigenous peoples down: a fraction that halves at every generation until, on paper, nobody qualifies. The sentence above says the arithmetic does not run. Whoever is in you is in you whole.

It follows through the mother exactly as it follows through the father, and this archive will not pretend otherwise for the sake of matching an older text. It follows into a family you married into. It follows into someone raised entirely elsewhere, in a language their grandparents did not speak, who has never seen the country. None of that is a discount.

The movement’s own definition

Palestine National Charter, 1968 — Article 4

The Palestinian identity is a genuine, essential, and inherent characteristic; it is transmitted from fathers to children. The Zionist occupation and the dispersal of the Palestinian Arab people, through the disasters which befell them, do not make them lose their Palestinian identity and their membership in the Palestinian community, nor do they negate them.

Article 5 continues: “The Palestinians are those Arab nationals who, until 1947, normally resided in Palestine regardless of whether they were evicted from it or stayed there. Anyone born, after that date, of a Palestinian father — whether in Palestine or outside it — is also a Palestinian.”

Adopted at the fourth Palestine National Council, Cairo, 10–17 July 1968. Text as published by PalQuest, the Institute for Palestine Studies’ encyclopedia.

The definition that governs an entitlement

UNRWA’s registration rule

Palestine refugees are defined as “persons whose normal place of residence was Palestine during the period 1 June 1946 to 15 May 1948, and who lost both home and means of livelihood as a result of the 1948 conflict.”

The Agency’s own page adds: “The descendants of Palestine refugee males, including adopted children, are also eligible for registration.” That is a rule about who may claim a service, not a ruling about who a person is — and the archive does not treat it as one.

Quoted as published on unrwa.org. We have not established what the Agency’s internal registration instructions provide beyond that sentence; the sentence is what it publishes.

Say the awkward part out loud

Both of the definitions above descend through the father. They were written by men, in the 1950s and 1960s, inside legal traditions that assumed a household had one line. A great many Palestinians alive today are Palestinian through their mother, and a great many others were born to a Palestinian woman and a foreign father and have spent their lives being told that this counts for less. It does not count for less. The archive’s position and the older drafting differ here, and rather than quietly re-quote the drafting as though it settled the question, we would rather show you both and tell you where we stand.

Who is permitted a document

الوثيقة

Everything above is a statement about belonging. Nothing above is a statement about law, and this archive will not let the two be confused, because the moment they are confused the whole thing becomes deniable. So here is the law, stated at its actual strength and no higher.

There is no Palestinian nationality statute in force that could naturalise a spouse, register a grandchild born in Santiago or Detroit, or issue a passport on the ground of being Palestinian. They took the land, then the state, then the capacity to issue anyone a document. What they could not reach is the first half of this page. The gap between who is Palestinian and who is permitted a document is not an accident of history — it is the mechanism.

  1. Nationality and citizenship are not the same thing

    The distinction is the whole of the argument, and it is not a rhetorical one. Nadim Bawalsa sets it out for Al-Shabaka: citizenship is an arrangement a person enters into with a state, and a state can withhold or strip it. Nationality is treated in international law as innate — the link between a person and a territory — and it argues that over seven million exiled Palestinians hold a right to be considered nationals of Palestine that Israeli law cannot extinguish. Bawalsa is clear that this right has not been activated: it is a claim to be pressed, not a passport in anyone’s hand.

    “But states cannot denationalize an individual. Under international law, nationality is innate and broadly defined as the link between an individual and a territory.”

    The Case for Palestinian Nationality — Nadim Bawalsa, Al-Shabaka: The Palestinian Policy Network, 29 September 2022.

  2. Israel holds the register that decides who exists on paper

    The 1995 Interim Agreement transferred population registry powers to the Palestinian side, and then qualified the transfer out of existence. New residents may be registered only “with the prior approval of Israel”, and Israel’s copy of the register went on functioning as the original because it is Israel’s copy that soldiers read at a checkpoint. Human Rights Watch states the consequence in one line.

    “Today, Palestinians must be included in the population registry to get identification cards and passports.”

    “Forget About Him, He’s Not Here”: Israel’s Control of Palestinian Residency in the West Bank and Gaza — Human Rights Watch, 5 February 2012.

  3. The people counted out have stayed counted out

    Israel’s September 1967 census counted 954,898 Palestinians physically present in the West Bank and Gaza and, in Human Rights Watch’s words, “did not include at least 270,000 Palestinians who were absent, either because they had fled during the conflict or were abroad for study, work, or other reasons.” Between 1967 and 1994 Israel then permanently cancelled the residency of a further 130,000 registered Palestinians of the West Bank, in many cases for having stayed away too long.

    “Forget About Him, He’s Not Here”: Israel’s Control of Palestinian Residency in the West Bank and Gaza — Human Rights Watch, 5 February 2012.

  4. A document that exists can be taken back

    Palestinians of East Jerusalem hold Israeli permanent residency rather than citizenship, and permanent residency is revocable. On Ministry of Interior figures obtained by HaMoked, Israel revoked the status of 14,929 Palestinians from East Jerusalem between 1967 and 2024 on the grounds that it had “expired of itself” — 60 of them in 2024 alone, 52 of those while they were outside the country.

    Revocation of permanent residency in 2024 — East Jerusalem — HaMoked — Center for the Defence of the Individual, 2 September 2025.

  5. Marrying a Palestinian does not get you a status

    HaMoked’s 2021 position paper on the frozen registry describes the predicament directly: thousands of Palestinian families in which one of the spouses is a foreigner without status in the occupied territory, or a West Bank resident carrying a Gaza address. The register that would record the marriage is not open, and it is not theirs to open. The record in both directions: six days after that paper, on 30 August 2021, Israel’s defence minister announced an agreement with the Palestinian Authority to legalise the status of foreign spouses and to allow registered addresses to be changed from Gaza to the West Bank — a discretionary arrangement announced by the party holding the register, which is the point rather than the exception to it.

    Position paper: Israeli control of the Palestinian population registry and its implications for Palestinians’ basic rights — HaMoked — Center for the Defence of the Individual, 24 August 2021.

  6. The right of return was resolved in 1948 and has not been honoured

    Paragraph 11 of General Assembly Resolution 194 (III), 11 December 1948, is short and unambiguous — though 194 (III) is a General Assembly resolution rather than a Security Council decision, the Assembly has reaffirmed it annually since, and no mechanism was ever created to enforce paragraph 11, which is what “has not been honoured” means in practice. UNRWA began work in 1950 responding to the needs of about 750,000 Palestine refugees; today some 5.9 million are eligible for its services. The registry grew instead of emptying, which is what a right of return looks like when it is not exercised.

    “Resolves that the refugees wishing to return to their homes and live at peace with their neighbours should be permitted to do so at the earliest practicable date, and that compensation should be paid for the property of those choosing not to return…”

    A/RES/194 (III), Palestine — Progress Report of the United Nations Mediator — United Nations General Assembly, 11 December 1948.

Two sentences that must not be merged

If you married a Palestinian, you are family. You are also, in law, nothing at all.

In a Palestinian family, the person who marries in is not a guest and is never described as one. They are asked about at every gathering for the rest of their life; their children are nobody’s half-anything; the village is theirs to name. That is what Palestinians mean when they say you become Palestinian by marriage, and it is worth more than it sounds — it is a whole people declining to police its own edges while somebody else polices everything else about it.

It is not, however, a naturalisation. We are not going to tell you it is, because a statement that collapses at the first check is worth nothing to you and worth a great deal to the people who would like this archive discredited. There is no ministry to apply to. HaMoked’s 2021 position paper on the frozen registry describes thousands of families in the occupied territory in which one spouse is a foreigner with no status whatsoever, unable to be recorded as living in the place they live in.

Hold both. The belonging is real and it is conferred by the people who have the standing to confer it. The document is withheld, by a state that is not theirs, through a register they do not hold. Nothing about the second fact reaches back and cancels the first — and if it could, there would have been no need to take the register in the first place.

They said you would forget

لن ننسى

Almost every Palestinian has heard the line: the old will die and the young will forget, attributed to David Ben-Gurion. It is on posters, in speeches, in documentaries and in a great many books. This archive is not going to repeat it, and the reason is more useful than the quotation.

What we could not verify

No primary source for this sentence has been produced

The most thorough public attempt to trace it is Asa Winstanley’s, published by The Electronic Intifada on 11 August 2013. He reports three findings. The citation usually given is page 157 of the American edition of Michael Bar-Zohar’s 1968 biography Ben-Gurion: The Armed Prophet; Winstanley bought a second-hand copy and writes that “the line is nowhere to be found.” Avi Raz of Oxford checked the diary entry the quotation is often dated to and reported: “There is no mention of Palestinian refugees in the 18 July 1948 entry (Ben-Gurion’sThe War Diary, vol. 2, pp. 598–602), let alone the quotation ‘The old will die and the young will forget.’” Avi Shlaim, who has read the diaries from 1947 to 1963, wrote: “My hunch is that the quote is wrongly attributed to BG but I could be wrong.”

Winstanley’s own conclusion is the careful one, and it is the one this archive adopts: while the sentence “is likely an accurate summary of David Ben-Gurion’s hope that the Palestinian refugees would disappear, it is almost certainly not his wording.”

We should be exact about our own position too. We read Winstanley’s investigation; we did not independently open Bar-Zohar or the war diaries. What we can state is that the attribution’s standard citation has been checked by people who report that it does not hold, that no one has produced an alternative primary source in the years since, and that we found none either. A quotation in that condition does not belong in a citable record, however much it is repeated — and being the archive that says so is worth more than being one more site that passes it on.

What is documented

The expectation is in the record. It just isn’t in that sentence.

The intent to remove is written in Ben-Gurion’s own hand, in a letter to his son Amos dated 5 October 1937, held in the Ben-Gurion Archives and translated into English by the Institute for Palestine Studies in Beirut. Arguing that the Negev could not be left in Palestinian hands, he wrote:

We must expel Arabs and take their place. Up to now, all our aspirations have been based on an assumption — one that has been vindicated throughout our activities in the country — that there is enough room in the land for the Arabs and ourselves.

That passage is contested and the contest should be on this page rather than discovered afterwards. Lines immediately before it are struck through in the manuscript, and the pro-Israel media group CAMERA has argued that the struck text reverses the meaning. The Electronic Intifada put the Hebrew to two professional translators and a linguist independently; all three rejected that reading. Two of them, however, agreed with CAMERA on a separate point that bears directly on the words quoted above: that the English “up to now” and “but” were inserted by the translators and are not explicit in the Hebrew — Daniel Shunra calling the insertion “regrettable, though immaterial and blown out of proportion.” We print the translation as published and record the objection to it, and one noted that the sentence carries a grammatical idiosyncrasy characteristic of Ben-Gurion — the missing object particleet — which a forger would have had to know to imitate. Readers can and should read the whole letter; it is linked below in full.

As for forgetting specifically, the closest sourced formulation Winstanley’s inquiry surfaced is Avi Raz’s citation of Tom Segev’s 1949: The First Israelis, page 31, where Ben-Gurion is described as holding that the refugee problem would solve itself: “In his opinion … time will cure all, and all will be forgotten.” We have not read Segev directly and we present it at that remove, which is exactly the standard the famous quotation fails.

Read the full 5 October 1937 letter in translation (PDF) — Translated by the Institute for Palestine Studies, Beirut, from the Ben-Gurion Archives; hosted by PalestineRemembered.com.

Whatever words were used, the expectation is not in doubt, and neither is what became of it. The rest of this page is the answer the expectation received.

Four generations later

الشتات

The plan required the grandchildren to lose interest. Instead they built archives. They wrote books about villages they had never seen, sat their grandparents down in front of cameras, learned the stitches, kept the keys, and turned up at weddings four thousand miles away doing the same dabke to the same songs.

None of that is sentiment. Every item is counted, catalogued and citable, and that is the only reason it appears here. Here is some of what can be counted.

15.5m

Palestinians worldwide

At the end of 2025 the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics put the number of Palestinians in the world at 15.5 million — 7.4 million in historic Palestine and 8.1 million in the diaspora, of them 6.8 million in Arab countries.

The archive’s figures →

Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics, Issued 12 May 2026.

750,000 → 5.9m

The register that was supposed to empty

UNRWA began in 1950 with about 750,000 Palestine refugees. Some 5.9 million are eligible for its services now. Nobody was replaced; four generations were added.

What registration means →

UNRWA.

120

Village books, written by hand

Rochelle Davis: “Over the course of a decade, I collected 120 village books written by Palestinians about the more than four hundred villages that were destroyed in the 1948 war.” Genealogies, wedding songs, the names of wells and springs, lists of shop owners — compiled by people who were not historians, for villages that are not on a map.

189 villages held here →

Jadaliyya, 7 December 2011.

~1,000 hrs

Recorded testimony, in Lebanon alone

The Palestinian Oral History Archive at the American University of Beirut holds around a thousand hours of audio and video testimony across more than 800 interviews, with speakers originating in over 130 Palestinian villages, cities and localities.

The archive entry →

American University of Beirut University Libraries.

Where the carrying is kept

Everything below is inside this archive, and every one of these pages exists because somebody in the third or fourth generation refused to let the thing go.

The village you came from

189 written village recordsfrom 1948, with what was grown there and who was counted there. Then theAtlas of source-verified sites, and15 family histories if the name you carry is in them.

The voices still recording

27testimonies held here, and25 archiveselsewhere that hold thousands more — PalestineRemembered, the Nakba Archive, the Palestinian Oral History Archive at AUB.

The things your family still does

44 entries on what is still being made and eaten and worn and danced:the thobe,tatreez,dabke,the keys,musakhan and maqluba.

Record someone before you can’t

A phone, a quiet room and someone who remembers is the single most valuable thing anyone can give this archive.The recording guide explains how, and the right of return explains what the recording is evidence of.

The song this page was written around

The archive keeps the prison songs of the Mandate years and songs written last year, and treats them as the same body of evidence. This one belongs to the person who built this site, which is why it can be embedded here without asking anyone.

Palestine is Free (Like a touch from the sun)

Jabhawee · the channel ↗ · more in the listening room

The track is known around the family by the line in its title, “a touch from the sun”. Printed here under its published title, which was checked against YouTube’s own metadata for this video rather than taken from memory. Nothing is re-hosted; the player is the official embed and does not load until you press play.

If you came here to find out whether you are allowed to say it

Say it. You do not need a document, a fluent tongue, a stamp in a passport or a relative’s permission. Nobody who is Palestinian was asked to prove it before the consequences arrived, and nobody should have to prove it before the belonging does.

If you know your village, learn one more thing about it this week. If you do not know it, ask the oldest person in your family tonight and write down what they say, exactly as they say it, including the parts they are unsure of. That is how every archive on this page began — including this one.

A hundred years of policy has been spent on the expectation that the generation reading this would be the one that let it go. Four generations in, the registers are larger, the recordings are longer, the books keep being written, and the songs are still being made. You are not the ending anyone planned for.

Sources

Every figure, date and quotation on this page was taken from one of the documents below and checked against it. Where a publisher’s server refuses automated requests, the archived snapshot that was actually read is given as well, so you can check exactly what we checked.

  1. Palestine National (watani) Charter, 1968 — Articles 4 and 5

    PalQuest — the Interactive Encyclopedia of the Palestine Question, Institute for Palestine Studies · Adopted at the 4th Palestine National Council, Cairo, 10–17 July 1968

    The Palestinian movement’s own definition of who is Palestinian, and its statement that dispersal does not negate that identity.

    Read via the Internet Archive snapshot — the publisher’s own server refuses automated requests.

  2. Palestine refugees — the definition and the descent rule

    UNRWA

    The 1946–48 residence definition, registration by descent, 750,000 in 1950 and some 5.9 million eligible today.

    Read via the Internet Archive snapshot — the publisher’s own server refuses automated requests.

  3. A/RES/194 (III), Palestine — Progress Report of the United Nations Mediator

    United Nations General Assembly · 11 December 1948

    Paragraph 11, quoted verbatim — the right of return and compensation.

  4. “Forget About Him, He’s Not Here”: Israel’s Control of Palestinian Residency in the West Bank and Gaza

    Human Rights Watch · 5 February 2012

    The 1967 census, the Interim Agreement’s “prior approval of Israel”, the 130,000 cancelled residencies, and the rule that the registry is the gateway to an ID card and a passport.

  5. Position paper: Israeli control of the Palestinian population registry and its implications for Palestinians’ basic rights

    HaMoked — Center for the Defence of the Individual · 24 August 2021

    The long-standing freeze of the registry, and the thousands of families in which one spouse is a foreigner without status.

    Read via the Internet Archive snapshot — the publisher’s own server refuses automated requests.

  6. Revocation of permanent residency in 2024 — East Jerusalem

    HaMoked — Center for the Defence of the Individual · 2 September 2025

    Ministry of Interior figures: 14,929 Jerusalemites stripped of status between 1967 and 2024.

    Read via the Internet Archive snapshot — the publisher’s own server refuses automated requests.

  7. The Case for Palestinian Nationality

    Nadim Bawalsa, Al-Shabaka: The Palestinian Policy Network · 29 September 2022

    The distinction between nationality and citizenship, the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne, the 1925 citizenship order, and the claim of over seven million exiled Palestinians to nationality.

  8. “The old will die and the young will forget” — Did Ben-Gurion say it?

    Asa Winstanley, The Electronic Intifada · 11 August 2013

    The investigation into the attribution: the Bar-Zohar page check, Avi Raz on the 18 July 1948 diary entry, Avi Shlaim’s assessment, and the Segev line.

    Read via the Internet Archive snapshot — the publisher’s own server refuses automated requests.

  9. Letter from David Ben-Gurion to his son Amos, 5 October 1937 — English translation

    Translated by the Institute for Palestine Studies, Beirut, from the Ben-Gurion Archives; hosted by PalestineRemembered.com

    The passage “We must expel Arabs and take their place”, read in full context.

  10. Press release on the 78th annual commemoration of the Palestinian Nakba

    Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics · Issued 12 May 2026

    15.5 million Palestinians worldwide at the end of 2025 — 7.4 million in historic Palestine, 8.1 million in the diaspora.

  11. About the Palestinian Oral History Archive

    American University of Beirut University Libraries

    Around 1,000 hours of testimony, over 800 interviews, speakers originating in over 130 Palestinian villages, cities and localities.

  12. New Texts Out Now: Rochelle Davis, “Palestinian Village Histories: Geographies of the Displaced”

    Jadaliyya · 7 December 2011

    The author’s own account: 120 village books collected over a decade, written by Palestinians about the destroyed villages.

The title of the song embedded above was verified against YouTube’s oEmbed record for the video. If you find an error anywhere on this page, tell us — corrections are made in public.

Cite this page

Every claim above carries its sources — citation is the point.

Chicago
“There is no partial Palestinian — belonging, the document, and four generations.” Belonging, FALASTEEN.AI. Accessed 22 August 2026. https://falasteen.ai/belonging.
MLA
“There is no partial Palestinian — belonging, the document, and four generations.” Belonging, FALASTEEN.AI, 2026, https://falasteen.ai/belonging. Accessed 22 August 2026.
BibTeX
@misc{falasteen-belonging, title = {There is no partial Palestinian — belonging, the document, and four generations}, howpublished = {\url{https://falasteen.ai/belonging}}, organization = {FALASTEEN.AI — A Living Archive for Palestine}, year = {2026}, note = {Accessed 2026-08-22} }
“We have on this earth what makes life worth living: the final days of April, the smell of bread at dawn, a woman’s opinion of men, the works of Aeschylus, the beginnings of love, grass on a stone.”
— Mahmoud Darwish, On This Earth

Photograph: Palestinian villagers dancing at the Nabi Musa festival, between 1920 and 1933 · Matson Photograph Collection, Library of Congress (public domain), via Wikimedia Commons