Legal2 min read

Hafrada

Hebrew for 'separation' — the word used in Israeli political discourse for the policy of physically and legally separating Israelis from Palestinians in the occupied territory, and taken up in human-rights analyses of the barrier, the permit regime, segregated road networks and the closure system.

Hafrada is the Hebrew word for separation. It has circulated in Israeli political discourse since the mid-1990s as the name of a goal — separation from the Palestinians — advocated by prime ministers from Yitzhak Rabin to Ehud Barak, and it is carried in the official Hebrew name of the barrier itself, geder ha-hafrada, the separation fence. Writers on the conflict and human-rights analysts have taken the word up for the wider apparatus built around that goal: the permit system that governs Palestinian movement, the checkpoints, the closure of Gaza — a formal “policy of separation” between Gaza and the West Bank, as Human Rights Watch records — and the road network in the West Bank on which settlers travel freely and Palestinians travel conditionally or not at all.

The barrier is the visible part. Begun in 2002 and running for hundreds of kilometres, it follows the Green Line for only a fraction of its length; the rest loops eastward into the occupied West Bank to place settlements on the Israeli side, enclosing Palestinian villages and cutting farmers off from their own fields. The land trapped between the barrier and the Green Line was declared a closed “Seam Zone,” where Palestinian residents and landowners require permits to live on, reach or cultivate land they own — permits granted at the discretion of the military and frequently refused.

The International Court of Justice examined this apparatus in 2004 and found that the construction of the wall in occupied territory, together with its associated regime, is contrary to international law; that it severely impedes the rights of Palestinians to freedom of movement, work, health and education; and that it risks creating a fait accompli tantamount to de facto annexation. Israel was held obliged to cease construction, dismantle the sections built in occupied territory and make reparation.

Separation also operates through planning. In Area C — about sixty percent of the West Bank, under full Israeli control — Israeli settlements are connected to water, electricity and roads while adjacent Palestinian communities are refused permits for houses, wells, clinics and schools, and the structures they build anyway are demolished. UN monitors describe the cumulative effect as a coercive environment designed to make staying untenable. In the argument over whether all this amounts to apartheid, the word hafrada matters because it did not originate as an accusation from outside: separation is the name Israeli discourse itself gave the policy, and the dispute is about what to call a system that separates two populations living in the same territory under two different legal regimes.

Sources

Cited works

4
  1. en.wikipedia.org — Hafrada(opens in a new tab)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafrada
  2. hrw.org — israeli authorities and crimes apartheid and persecution(opens in a new tab)https://www.hrw.org/report/2021/04/27/threshold-crossed/israeli-authorities-and-crimes-apartheid-and-persecution
  3. icj-cij.org(opens in a new tab)https://www.icj-cij.org/case/131
  4. ochaopt.org — area c key humanitarian concernsPDF(opens in a new tab)https://www.ochaopt.org/sites/default/files/area_c_key_humanitarian_concerns.pdf