Rhetoric2 min read

You will hear

“Arabs have 22 countries; Palestinians can just go live in one of them”

The short answer

Self-determination is the right of each people in its own country, not an interchangeable commodity by language group — the UN recognized the Palestinian people's inalienable rights, including return to their homes, in Resolution 3236 (XXIX) of 1974, and no state would accept the same argument for itself.

The argument dissolves a specific people into a language group. “Arab” describes a vast cultural-linguistic world stretching from Morocco to Iraq, as diverse as the Spanish- or English-speaking worlds; Palestinians are as attached to Palestine as Mexicans are to Mexico or the Portuguese to Portugal. Common Article 1 of the ICCPR and the ICESCR declares that “all peoples have the right of self-determination” — by virtue of which they freely determine their political status — and the right attaches to a people in its own homeland, not to any place where a similar language is spoken. No one proposes that Austrians should relocate to Germany, or that a people’s eviction is cured by the existence of twenty other nations sharing their tongue.

The international community has never accepted the interchangeable-Arab premise. On 22 November 1974, the General Assembly adopted Resolution 3236 (XXIX) by 87 votes to 8, reaffirming “the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people in Palestine,” including “the right to self-determination without external interference” and “the right to national independence and sovereignty,” together with the right of Palestinians “to return to their homes and property from which they have been displaced and uprooted.” UN studies on the international status of the Palestinian people record the same recognition across decades of resolutions.

There is also a practical irony: the Arab host states themselves rejected the “they are all Arabs” logic. Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt have hosted the refugees of 1948 and 1967 as refugees — pending return — rather than as immigrants to be absorbed, and the Arab states have insisted at the UN since 1948 that the solution lies in the refugees’ right to return to their own country, not in their redistribution across someone else’s. The claim that Palestinians should settle for an Arab country that is not theirs is an argument no nation makes about itself.

Sources

Cited works

3
  1. un.org — auto insert 196558(opens in a new tab)https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-196558/
  2. un.org — auto insert 204352(opens in a new tab)https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-204352/
  3. un.org — auto insert 199840(opens in a new tab)https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-199840/